Fewer Options Fast

Decision = Yes or No

Many Options Slow

Decision = Overwhelm

Hick's Law: More choices = longer decisions = more drop-offs

Every unnecessary step costs you customers

The Buying Path Audit — Every Step Costs You Customers

Hick's Law: the more choices you give people, the longer they take to decide — and the more likely they are to decide nothing. A service page with…

Get CustomersAudit

The psychology behind this day

Hick's Law (Laws of UX, Ch. 2): The time it takes to make a decision increases logarithmically with the number of options. This is why a service page with 12 offerings converts worse than one with three. Every additional choice creates cognitive load, and when cognitive load exceeds capacity, the default action is inaction. Simplify choices to speed decisions.

Fitts's Law adapted for digital (Laws of UX, Ch. 1): The time to reach a target is a function of the distance to and size of the target. In web terms: the harder it is to find and click the CTA, the fewer people complete it. Every extra click, scroll, or page load between "interested" and "paid" is a measurable loss.

Choice Architecture (Nudge, Ch. 1): Thaler's foundational insight — the way choices are presented fundamentally changes what people choose. The default option wins in almost every scenario. If "add to cart" requires 6 steps and "leave" requires closing a tab, you've designed a choice architecture that favours leaving. The buying path isn't just a sequence — it's an architecture you design, and the architecture nudges behaviour.

The Paradox of Choice (referenced in Making Websites Win, Ch. 10): Barry Schwartz's research: when people face too many options, they experience decision paralysis and post-decision regret. More options = fewer conversions + less satisfaction. The fix isn't hiding options — it's curating them. Present three plans, not twelve. Offer one clear CTA, not five.

Optional — go deeper (videos)

Barry Schwartz: "The Paradox of Choice" — TED Talk

YouTube (~20 min) — Why more choice leads to less action and less happiness.

The Lesson

70%

of cart customers lost during checkout — not because they didn't want it

Hick's Law

More choices = longer decisions = more drop-offs

Fitts's Law

Harder to reach = fewer completions

Today's Exercise

Walk through your own buying process as if you're a customer who's never seen your business before.

  1. Start from Google (or Instagram, or wherever customers find you).
  2. Count every click, every page load, every form field between "I found this business" and "I've paid/enquired/booked."
  3. At each step, ask: "Would I drop off here? Is this step necessary? Is anything confusing?"
  4. Note every point of friction: unclear CTAs, too many form fields, no pricing signals, required account creation, confusing navigation.

AI-Assisted (Strategy folder)

"You are a conversion optimisation specialist who uses decision-making psychology and friction analysis to diagnose customer journeys.

My business: [business type] My customer's journey from finding me to buying (describe each step — be honest about every click, page, form, and decision point): [describe]

Using the decision-making and friction research in this project, do the following step by step:

1. Map each step I've described and classify it: is this step necessary for the customer or only for me? 2. For each point of friction, name the specific psychological principle being violated (e.g., Hick's Law — too many choices, cognitive load — too much information at once, loss aversion — no safety signals before asking for money). 3. Suggest a specific fix for each friction point, grounded in the behavioural research. 4. Prioritise: rank the friction points by impact. What single fix would have the biggest effect on conversion?

Format: Give me a table (Step / Friction Type / Psychological Principle / Fix / Priority: High/Medium/Low), then a one-paragraph recommendation of what to fix first and why."

Output: A friction map of your buying process with every unnecessary step identified and a prioritised fix list.

Week 1 Synthesis

You've now looked at your business through six different lenses: the trust gap (Day 1), the three-second test (Day 3), the four-step framework (Day 4), features vs. benefits (Day 5), social proof architecture (Day 6), and the buying path (Day 7).

Each lens revealed something. Now synthesise.

After completing the buying path audit above, step back and answer:

  1. Which of the four steps is your weakest? (Most businesses have a clear loser.)
  2. What are the three most important gaps you've discovered this week — the three that, if fixed, would have the biggest impact on whether customers buy?
  3. For each of those three gaps, write one sentence describing what "fixed" looks like.

This is your baseline diagnosis. Everything from Week 2 onward builds on it.

Additional output: A one-page summary: your weakest step, your top 3 gaps, and what "fixed" looks like for each.

Share your progress: Post your weakest step and top gap — even anonymously. "My biggest gap is Step 2 (Trust). My website looks amateur compared to competitors." You've just invested a full week. Making that public cements the commitment and makes Week 2 feel like the logical next step, not a fresh decision.